<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Actual Confusion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://actualconfusion.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://actualconfusion.com</link>
	<description>An Intellectual Property Blog that&#039;s 100 x 35</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 20:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1st Circuit Tells Walter Mercado to Use Another Name (And Trademark) by Luis Figarella</title>
		<link>http://actualconfusion.com/2011/12/22/1st-circuit-tells-walter-mercado-to-use-another-name-and-trademark/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Figarella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 20:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://actualconfusion.com/?p=480#comment-102</guid>
		<description>Walter Walter Walter, you couldn&#039;t look into the crystal ball and predict the future? You NEVER assign anything without a term limit (good enough for the President, good enough for me). 

I recommend to my patent clients (where, not having as much lobbying money, we are limited to 20 years), to not assign, but sign an exclusive license (say for 10 years, with following 5 year options). Sure, you&#039;ll take less money up front, but insurance ALWAYS costs money.

Of course you Copyright/TM people with your effective eternity (75, 99, 125, who can count that many years?) should REALLY pay attention to insurance and &#039;corporate&#039; prenups.

Keep them coming Jean, if a certain PR government agency does not get educated in patent infringement, maybe we can have some more postings for this blog!

A lowly (but happy ;-) patent prosecutor,

Feliz Navidad

Luis Figarella</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walter Walter Walter, you couldn&#8217;t look into the crystal ball and predict the future? You NEVER assign anything without a term limit (good enough for the President, good enough for me). </p>
<p>I recommend to my patent clients (where, not having as much lobbying money, we are limited to 20 years), to not assign, but sign an exclusive license (say for 10 years, with following 5 year options). Sure, you&#8217;ll take less money up front, but insurance ALWAYS costs money.</p>
<p>Of course you Copyright/TM people with your effective eternity (75, 99, 125, who can count that many years?) should REALLY pay attention to insurance and &#8216;corporate&#8217; prenups.</p>
<p>Keep them coming Jean, if a certain PR government agency does not get educated in patent infringement, maybe we can have some more postings for this blog!</p>
<p>A lowly (but happy <img src='http://actualconfusion.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  patent prosecutor,</p>
<p>Feliz Navidad</p>
<p>Luis Figarella</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1st Circuit Tells Walter Mercado to Use Another Name (And Trademark) by El Rata</title>
		<link>http://actualconfusion.com/2011/12/22/1st-circuit-tells-walter-mercado-to-use-another-name-and-trademark/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>El Rata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 20:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://actualconfusion.com/?p=480#comment-101</guid>
		<description>What do I think? I think Walter should have seen this coming!!! ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do I think? I think Walter should have seen this coming!!! <img src='http://actualconfusion.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trademark Infringement: Britto Strikes the &#8220;Brittoleras&#8221; by rohan akhtar</title>
		<link>http://actualconfusion.com/2011/09/14/trademark-infringement-britto-strikes-the-brittoleras/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>rohan akhtar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 12:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://actualconfusion.com/?p=446#comment-100</guid>
		<description>Britto colorful paintings are really heart touching and we love to see her paintings and other art work, and this article is really informative and I&#039;m still want to read more after reading this one.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.popartmiami.com/romero-britto/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;britto&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Britto colorful paintings are really heart touching and we love to see her paintings and other art work, and this article is really informative and I&#8217;m still want to read more after reading this one.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.popartmiami.com/romero-britto/" rel="nofollow">britto</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Facebook v. TeachBook: The Dilution of &quot;the Book&quot; by Facebook slams Teachbook &#124; Actual Confusion</title>
		<link>http://actualconfusion.com/2010/08/25/facebook-v-teachbook-the-dilution-of-the-book/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook slams Teachbook &#124; Actual Confusion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://actualconfusion.com/?p=101#comment-98</guid>
		<description>[...] tidbit came courtesy of the California Bar&#8217;s IP publication. A while back we told you about Facebook&#8217;s suit against &#8220;Teachbook&#8221; over the use of the &#8220;Book&#8221; mark and possible dilution. Seems Teachbook filed a motion [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tidbit came courtesy of the California Bar&#8217;s IP publication. A while back we told you about Facebook&#8217;s suit against &#8220;Teachbook&#8221; over the use of the &#8220;Book&#8221; mark and possible dilution. Seems Teachbook filed a motion [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Intellectual Property Litigation: Federal Statistics Roundup by Playforplay</title>
		<link>http://actualconfusion.com/2011/08/23/intellectual-property-litigation-federal-statistics-roundup/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Playforplay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 05:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://actualconfusion.com/?p=430#comment-97</guid>
		<description>THANK YOU SO MUCH</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THANK YOU SO MUCH</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Intellectual Property Litigation: Federal Statistics Roundup by Actual Confusion</title>
		<link>http://actualconfusion.com/2011/08/23/intellectual-property-litigation-federal-statistics-roundup/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Actual Confusion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://actualconfusion.com/?p=430#comment-96</guid>
		<description>Here is the actual table: http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/Statistics/StatisticalTablesForTheFederalJudiciary/2010/dec10/C03Dec10.pdf

Look under the 9th circuit, and you will see the California Districts. Hope this helps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the actual table: <a href="http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/Statistics/StatisticalTablesForTheFederalJudiciary/2010/dec10/C03Dec10.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/Statistics/StatisticalTablesForTheFederalJudiciary/2010/dec10/C03Dec10.pdf</a></p>
<p>Look under the 9th circuit, and you will see the California Districts. Hope this helps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Intellectual Property Litigation: Federal Statistics Roundup by Playforplay</title>
		<link>http://actualconfusion.com/2011/08/23/intellectual-property-litigation-federal-statistics-roundup/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Playforplay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 09:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://actualconfusion.com/?p=430#comment-95</guid>
		<description>I looked, but could not find the numbers for CA specifically. Would you please give the actual link.

Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I looked, but could not find the numbers for CA specifically. Would you please give the actual link.</p>
<p>Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Intellectual Property Litigation: Federal Statistics Roundup by Actual Confusion</title>
		<link>http://actualconfusion.com/2011/08/23/intellectual-property-litigation-federal-statistics-roundup/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Actual Confusion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 13:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://actualconfusion.com/?p=430#comment-94</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s here: http://www.uscourts.gov/Statistics/StatisticalTablesForTheFederalJudiciary.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s here: <a href="http://www.uscourts.gov/Statistics/StatisticalTablesForTheFederalJudiciary.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.uscourts.gov/Statistics/StatisticalTablesForTheFederalJudiciary.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Intellectual Property Litigation: Federal Statistics Roundup by Playforplay</title>
		<link>http://actualconfusion.com/2011/08/23/intellectual-property-litigation-federal-statistics-roundup/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>Playforplay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 06:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://actualconfusion.com/?p=430#comment-93</guid>
		<description>Where did you find the statistics
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where did you find the statistics</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Proyecto De Ley Para Enmendar Derechos Morales by Robert</title>
		<link>http://actualconfusion.com/2011/09/20/proyecto-de-ley-para-enmendar-derechos-morales/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 01:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://actualconfusion.com/?p=453#comment-92</guid>
		<description>Soy yo el unico que ve una posible violacion de la primera enmienda ahi?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soy yo el unico que ve una posible violacion de la primera enmienda ahi?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

